In my
research paper, I want to explore Evolutionary Psychology and everyday life, specifically the theme of Altruism and Cooperation being critical to our
success as a society, and where the theory of Darwinism is so pervasive. In
the book “Living with Our Genes “by
Dean Hamer and Peter Copeland it is about the psychology of “emotional instinct
and the genetic roots of personality.” Chapter one explains the “mental,
emotional, social and physical character” of a person and the behavior of that
person is taught and learned by the parent’s actions. Your behavior determines
how you interact with others, the way you socialize, the rules you believe in,
and the emotion you express. These traits determine the person you are in a community.
Personality is the link to the selfish gene and it is why people are influenced
to behave a certain way. Personality is what makes a society and certain habits impact human behavior.
In “Living with Our Genes “by Dean Hamer and
Peter Copeland explains that our inherent genes are
based on the merger of two people, our parents and in some capacity, we have
inherent traits from them that can impact our personalities. Nonetheless, people
can also learn from anyone they surround themselves with and can learn social
norms from the rules that are directed from the behavioral patterns that are
influenced in groups and a culture.
The second research paper
I examined, “In the Exaggerated moral claim of evolutionary psychologist” by
Moses L. Pava, the article explains how people are built to
think logically and use their intuition to make a decision to choose the best
course of action. This ability to make such a choice is known to be a
deliberate act, which allows a person to think carefully before making an
irrational decision. Therefore, people have a natural instinct to look after
themselves. In the article, it gives an example of a trolley and five men. “Assume
you realized a lever that you can pull that would change the direction of the
trolley to another track, where there is only one man working on the other
track. What would you do?” Sadly, logically your actions would save the five
men rather saving just one.
No comments:
Post a Comment